ProWarDotCom: Difference between revisions

From Liberpedia
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The pseudo-libertarian, pseudo-antiwar, [[kremlintarian]] website “antiwar.com”, who happily supports every war as long as it’s not by the US:
The pseudo-libertarian, pseudo-antiwar, [[kremlintarian]] website “antiwar.com”, who happily supports wars of aggression:


* “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [https://original.antiwar.com/ted_galen_carpenter/2022/06/06/the-closer-ukraine-gets-to-victory-the-closer-the-world-comes-to-nuclear-war/]
* “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [https://original.antiwar.com/ted_galen_carpenter/2022/06/06/the-closer-ukraine-gets-to-victory-the-closer-the-world-comes-to-nuclear-war/]
Line 7: Line 7:
|sign=
|sign=
[[Patrick J. Buchanan]], “[https://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2022/05/19/quo-vadis-mother-russia/ Quo Vadis, Mother Russia?]”, [[ProWarDotCom]]
[[Patrick J. Buchanan]], “[https://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2022/05/19/quo-vadis-mother-russia/ Quo Vadis, Mother Russia?]”, [[ProWarDotCom]]
}}
{{Quote|text=
It's at times like these that I tend to believe the wrong side won the war in the Pacific. Just think: if we all woke up one day living in some alternate history, as in Phillip K. Dick's The Man in the High Castle, our cultural malaise would disappear overnight. Instead of listening to the latest loutish lyrics of Eminem, American teenagers would be contemplating the subtle beauty of the Japanese tea ceremony. If contemporary Japan is any clue, the crime rate would be cut by 95 percent, and the literacy rate would skyrocket. Certainly everyone's manners would improve. All in all, life would be far more civilized, imbued with a gentility that would make the New York Post an impossibility.
|sign=
[[Justin Raimondo]], [https://www.antiwar.com/justin/j080801.html ProWarDotCom]
}}
}}



Revision as of 22:46, 20 September 2022

The pseudo-libertarian, pseudo-antiwar, kremlintarian website “antiwar.com”, who happily supports wars of aggression:

  • “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [1]

Even the falls of the British and French empires at the end of World War II do not match as geo-strategic disasters the collapse of the Soviet Empire and breakup of the Soviet Union since the end of the Cold War.

Patrick J. Buchanan, “Quo Vadis, Mother Russia?”, ProWarDotCom

It's at times like these that I tend to believe the wrong side won the war in the Pacific. Just think: if we all woke up one day living in some alternate history, as in Phillip K. Dick's The Man in the High Castle, our cultural malaise would disappear overnight. Instead of listening to the latest loutish lyrics of Eminem, American teenagers would be contemplating the subtle beauty of the Japanese tea ceremony. If contemporary Japan is any clue, the crime rate would be cut by 95 percent, and the literacy rate would skyrocket. Certainly everyone's manners would improve. All in all, life would be far more civilized, imbued with a gentility that would make the New York Post an impossibility.

Justin Raimondo, ProWarDotCom

In particular, tends to present dubious authors in a positive way...

  • Eric S. Margolis: “Award winning author, columnist, and broadcaster Eric S. Margolis has covered 14 wars and is a leading authority on military affairs” [2]
  • Noam Chomsky: “Professor Noam Chomsky, believed to be the greatest living intellectual of our time.” [3]

Contributors

See also