ProWarDotCom
The pseudo-libertarian, pseudo-antiwar, kremlintarian website “antiwar.com”, who happily supports wars of aggression, making them literally warmongers:
- “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [1]
“ For crying out loud. This is not the wanton invasion of a historically separate and independent nation by an aggressive neighbor. “Ukraine” means borderlands in Russian and for centuries its territories were a vassal and sometimes integral part of the the Russian empire. In fact, today’s borders represent little more than the parts and pieces that got assembled into a single state by Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev for the convenience of their bloody rule.
- — David Stockman, “Why RFK’s Candidacy Matters to the Conservative Cause”, May 15, 2023
“ Even the falls of the British and French empires at the end of World War II do not match as geo-strategic disasters the collapse of the Soviet Empire and breakup of the Soviet Union since the end of the Cold War.
“ It’s at times like these that I tend to believe the wrong side won the war in the Pacific. Just think: if we all woke up one day living in some alternate history, as in Phillip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle, our cultural malaise would disappear overnight. Instead of listening to the latest loutish lyrics of Eminem, American teenagers would be contemplating the subtle beauty of the Japanese tea ceremony. If contemporary Japan is any clue, the crime rate would be cut by 95 percent, and the literacy rate would skyrocket. Certainly everyone’s manners would improve. All in all, life would be far more civilized, imbued with a gentility that would make the New York Post an impossibility.
In particular, tends to present dubious authors in a positive way...
- Eric S. Margolis: “Award winning author, columnist, and broadcaster Eric S. Margolis has covered 14 wars and is a leading authority on military affairs” [2]
- Noam Chomsky: “Professor Noam Chomsky, believed to be the greatest living intellectual of our time.” [3]
Contributors
See also
“The http://antiwar.com types in 1999, like Justin Raimondo, insisted it was perfectly right and proper for Slobodan Milosevic to crush the Kosovo secession movement. Now these same types say Ukraine fighting Russian infiltration in 2014 was ”genocide.“” [5]
about Kyle Varner, Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro
bad sushi
https://web.archive.org/web/20041212091520/http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=P1531_0_1_0
Name
FBI
https://archive.org/details/Antiwar.com/page/n23/mode/1up
Dugin
https://web.archive.org/web/20160108123443/http://katehon.com/article/apocalypse-praxis Our allies in the Antiwar movement are very simply those factions who have consistently opposed all the Clinton, Bush & Obama wars. The antiwar.com-Counterpunch alliance that has been struggling against the neocon war party since Serbia is an example of a functional 4PT style alliance between the “left” and the “right”. This alliance has had real success in the antiwar movement as the public support has dried up for large invasions, and the war with Syria just didn’t sell this time around. We must build on this and continue to tirelessly and mercilessly poison the war party’s brand. We must work to expand this struggle to as many possible fronts, because both Bush and Clinton will be worse than Obama.
Lew Rockwell Cesspool
Eric Garris (born December 24, 1953) is an activist in the libertarian movement in the United States, reaching back to the Vietnam War. He is the founder and webmaster of a daily nonpartisan, news source Antiwar.com which was launched in 1995.
“From 1999 to 2012, Garris was the webmaster for http://LewRockwell.com, the webmagazine of libertarian political commentator Lew Rockwell.”
The website AntiWar Blog reports on the current escalation of Russian-Ukrainian conflict from Russia’s perspective, and shares the same Google Analytics tracking code as LewRockwell.com
Bordertarianism
“ Europe’s elites shudder with horror at Joerg Haider. But the dirty little secret of Europe – and it really is not even much of a secret – is that almost everyone agrees with him. Europeans are distinctly unenthusiastic – to put it mildly – about immigrants. They lower incomes, spoil the quality of life and undermine national cultures. Most Americans believe the same thing. But in Europe politicians respond and pass laws that restrict the rights of entry of asylum seekers. Europe’s elites drone on endlessly about enlarging the European Union and inviting a number of the former Soviet bloc countries to become members. As far as most European voters are concerned, however, this would be nothing short of disaster. Like Haider, they do not want to be inundated by Poles and Slovaks looking for work and undermining trade union bargaining power. Nor do they want to see BMW or Renault transferring their operations to the East. As for “free trade,” Europeans expect full-blooded protectionism from the EU.
- — George Szamuely, “Decline of the West: Clinton in Europe”, June 1st, 2000
