ProWarDotCom: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [https://original.antiwar.com/ted_galen_carpenter/2022/06/06/the-closer-ukraine-gets-to-victory-the-closer-the-world-comes-to-nuclear-war/] | * “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [https://original.antiwar.com/ted_galen_carpenter/2022/06/06/the-closer-ukraine-gets-to-victory-the-closer-the-world-comes-to-nuclear-war/] | ||
{{Quote|text= | |||
Even the falls of the British and French empires at the end of World War II do not match as geo-strategic disasters the collapse of the Soviet Empire and breakup of the Soviet Union since the end of the Cold War. | |||
|sign= | |||
[[Patrick J. Buchanan]], “[https://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2022/05/19/quo-vadis-mother-russia/ Quo Vadis, Mother Russia?]”, [[ProWarDotCom]] | |||
}} | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 19 August 2022
The pseudo-libertarian, pseudo-antiwar, kremlintarian website “antiwar.com”, who happily supports every war as long as it’s not by the US:
- “the least bad outcome of the war would be a Russian victory” [1]
“ Even the falls of the British and French empires at the end of World War II do not match as geo-strategic disasters the collapse of the Soviet Empire and breakup of the Soviet Union since the end of the Cold War.
