Murray N. Rothbard/Revisionism: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:20, 14 May 2023

Review of The Origins of the Second World War
- see: The Second World War
- Taylor, in retrospect: “At that time no original sources were available: no cabinet minutes or papers, no Chiefs of Staff records, only more or less formal documents from the Foreign Office with very occasional minutes. This extraordinary paucity, as it seems now, makes my book a period piece of limited value.” (Wikipedia: The Origins of the Second World War)
- “However, according to Kathleen Burk’s biography of Taylor, he did not read Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf until after writing the book.” (Wikipedia: The Origins of the Second World War)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== [[WWII]] Revisionism ==
-The shell game, then, is to sa~ first, that Pat is not necessarily anti-Se- mitic because he is critical ofIsrael, but that Rosenthal’s proboscis tells him that Pat is an anti-Semite. Before writing his hate-Buchanan column, Rosenthal says that he consulted none other than Elie Wiesel, the profes- sional Holocaust survivor, who pronounced the magic words: ’~thoughI very rarely use the word ’antisemite’“ (Hah! That’ll be the day!), opined Wiesel, ”I feel there is something in him that is opposed to my people.“ Well, that’s it: Who can quarrel with Wiesel’s ineffable ”feelings"? Between Wiesel’s inner oracle and Rosenthal’s nose, no one has much ofa chance.
-== WWII Revisionism ==
 * [https://mises.org/library/review-origins-second-world-war Review of The Origins of the Second World War]