View source for Why do I always say that the problem is not so much in the fall as in the lack of prospects for long-term growth?

Why do I always say that the problem is not so much in the fall as in the lack of prospects for long-term growth?

Look, the average real GDP growth rate in Russia in the period from 2016 to 2019 was in the region of 1.2% per year. Let's imagine that the Russian economy will fall for 2 years and the total fall will be 15%. Further, the economy grows at an average of 1.5% per year (which is very optimistic).

It will take about 10 years to catch up with 2021 levels.

If such a drop were not associated with the economic blockade, and the prospects for long-term growth improved, and we grew at least by 3% per year (which is also not much for an economy of our level of development), the problem would be solved in 6 years. 4% - a little over 4 years. 5% - a little more than 3.

A little more about economic growth and its significance.

Imagine we are in 2019. Per capita GDP at PPP is almost $29,000. The figures show how many years it would take at different growth rates to catch up with 2019 US PPP per capita GDP.

10 years at an average rate of 8% per year.

[[File:Grow10.jpg]]

12 years at 7%.

[[File:Grow12.jpg]]

14 years at 6%.

[[File:Grow14.jpg]]

26 years at 3%.

[[File:Grow26.jpg]]

40 years at 2%.

[[File:Grow40.jpg]]

With a fall of 15% and a growth rate of 1.5% per year - 64 years.

You can play with other countries [http://oliverwkim.com/The-Mountain-To-Climb/The-Mountain-To-Climb here]<ref>[http://oliverwkim.com/The-Mountain-To-Climb/The-Mountain-To-Climb The-Mountain-To-Climb] Oliver W. Kim</ref>

[[Grigory Bazhenov]] 2022-03-29
[[ru:Почему я всегда говорю, что проблема не столько в падении, сколько в отсутствии перспектив долгосрочного роста?]]