Woe to the victorious

From Liberpedia
Revision as of 23:45, 29 October 2022 by LPReditors (talk | contribs) (Created page with "As you know, "a war is bad - the only thing worse is a lost war." In reasoning that there is no more deplorable scenario than the defeat of Russia, it is important to avoid specifics and end pathetic statements with general phrases that predict darkness and horror. Apocalypse! End of story! Sunset of the world! Ragnarok! Do not go into details - let the impressionable reader imagine how the terrible Ukrainian pig wolf will swallow our quivering Russian sun. But let's dea...")
(diff) ←Older revision | view current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

As you know, "a war is bad - the only thing worse is a lost war." In reasoning that there is no more deplorable scenario than the defeat of Russia, it is important to avoid specifics and end pathetic statements with general phrases that predict darkness and horror. Apocalypse! End of story! Sunset of the world! Ragnarok! Do not go into details - let the impressionable reader imagine how the terrible Ukrainian pig wolf will swallow our quivering Russian sun. But let's deal with the unpopular - let's try to go over the specifics.The victory of Ukraine is, of course, really the worst thing that can happen to us. Just listen to what Zelensky says. Like, they do not want either Belgorod or Kuban. And they want, at most, to return the old borders and receive reparations. However, we know that these are all words, but in fact the world's Masonic lodges are planning the "collapse of Russia" by 1000 bantustans and the infection of Russians with bird flu, which affects only the Slavs.At the same time, children will be converted to the LGBT faith, assigning them parent 1 and parent 2. Hell, I don’t seem to have much specifics here either, but finally turn on your imagination, are you Russian people or who?

Now let's think about what is the "victory of Russia"? Now, such a scenario will be the retention of the ancestral territories that have returned to their native harbor. Well, let's say they kept it, but what's next? The people there, of course, are ours, but somehow contradictory - on the one hand, they unanimously voted 99.9% "for" in the most honest referendum in the world, on the other hand, in the Russian media a day later there were reports of "terrorist attacks." It seems that in order to sort out the contradictions, it will take an "anti-terrorist operation" for a lot of years (and this is people and money).At the same time, Russia will remain under sanctions. Here the Russian Federation, of course, counts on the strategy of "freeze-freeze the wolf's tail," but, alas, most of the world does not depend on Russian oil and gas.

What does this look suspiciously like? North Caucasus, only at maximum speed. And not in conditions of abundance of oil and gas, but in conditions of an economy stagnating under sanctions and a clear lack of workers. Corruption will also be more, because there is now the Wild Southwest, where fortune accompanies the daring and bold. Unlike the shameful one-time reparations, the money "for restoration" will go away annually and each time mysteriously disappear into no one knows where. More precisely, about the same place where 1.5 million sets of uniforms of the Ministry of Defense have gone.Everyone will shrug, but ask for more money. In the end, money is a spray, only hucksters count it. The main thing is the reunification of peoples and the restoration of historical justice!

But if we put ourselves for a second in the place of the soulless hucksters, then we can think about this: when the people do not have a normal representation, they are ruled by interest groups. And interest groups know how to cash in on a falling market and play zero-sum games - like, everyone is bad, but some are even very good. General budgetary money also has one magical property - disappearing to no one knows where, they materialize in the pockets of quite specific citizens. Perhaps there are beneficiaries here too - those who stick to the cash flows that will flow to the South-West? And, perhaps, these beneficiaries have numerous media servants? Perhaps even it is they who are now telling us that the main thing is "not a step back", otherwise a disaster? Well, no, this cannot be - just look into those honest Russian eyes! However, just in case, I would still advise you to think about the sources of income of other authors, and also to check if they have photos from "humanitarian missions in Kherson" in their banned extremist Instagram.

Mihail Pojarsky 21/10/2022