“anti-imperialism” of idiots: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
By James Kirchick | By James Kirchick | ||
The Stability-Fetishist | |||
Both left-wing ‘anti-imperialism’ and traditional realism can be filed under this category. Each represents a different face of an attitude which views people as mere chess pieces in the great game of international statecraft. | |||
* [https://unherd.com/2018/06/six-types-useful-idiot/ Six types of ‘useful idiot’] | |||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 5 October 2022
“ This ‘anti-imperialism’ of idiots is one which equates imperialism with the actions of the US alone.
“ It’s really to the point now that if someone has anti-imperialist in their bio I assume they support the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
“ Some of these American left orgs that call themselves “anti-war” and “anti-imperialist” seem to mean anti-ONLY-US-imperialist and pro genocide as long as it’s by anyone the US government might consider “bad.” It’s disgusting to watch.
What I see is: The only thing bad is the US, everything else is totally fine. Who cares what people harmed “over there” say? We know better because we’re American.
Zero nuance. Zero contextual analysis.
https://twitter.com/gabriel3arroyo/status/1574933670699290624 "It is amazing how 99% of the people who claim to be anti imperialists, always end up defending the most insane and stupid bullshit. Despite the fact anti imperialism is obviously correct, there is something about it, that only attracts unhinged lunatics."
Anti-imperialism: Russia initiating a violent imperialist invasion isn't a problem, but the US sending aid is somehow the reason why there's no peace 👍🏼
https://twitter.com/KareemRifai/status/1576214157162340352
Russia’s war against Ukraine has exposed the incompetence of the Russian military and the hubris of President Putin. It has also revealed the bravery and resilience of the Ukrainian people, who, contrary to Ron Paul’s ambulatory talking point, had no need of any American to prod or gull them into defending their homeland. Here in the U.S., the war has also exposed the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of an ideologically diverse set of foreign-policy commentators: the “anti-imperialists” who routinely justify blatant acts of imperial conquest, and the “realists” who make arguments unmoored from reality.
How the Anti-war Camp Went Intellectually Bankrupt Critics of U.S. foreign policy from both ends of the ideological spectrum have found common cause in supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/anti-war-camp-intellectually-bankrupt/671576/ By James Kirchick
The Stability-Fetishist
Both left-wing ‘anti-imperialism’ and traditional realism can be filed under this category. Each represents a different face of an attitude which views people as mere chess pieces in the great game of international statecraft.
Examples
- US libertarians in general: Kremlintarianism
- “Stop the War”: “Marching forth with Stop the War: Britain’s left must reject the anti-West reactionaries at the heart of its movement” (archive)
- Ukraine: Taras Bilous, “A letter to the Western Left from Kyiv”, February 25, 2022 [1]
- Israel: Alan Johnson, “The Anti-Imperialism of Idiots”, “Linfield’s book shows how the ground was laid for the Old Left’s socialism of fools to morph into the New Left’s anti-imperialism of idiots.” (the book: Susie Linfield, The Lions’ Den: Zionism and the Left from Hannah Arendt to Noam Chomsky)
