Negative anti-accounting fallacy: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
(Created page with "The anti-accounting fallacy consists in denying government actions had to cost something. The negative anti-accounting fallacy consists in denying that government actions produce something, which might be either negative, neutral, or positive.") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[anti-accounting fallacy]] consists in denying government actions had to cost something. | The [[anti-accounting fallacy]] consists in denying government actions had to cost something. | ||
The [[negative anti-accounting fallacy]] consists in denying that government actions produce something, which might be either negative, neutral, or positive. | The [[negative anti-accounting fallacy]] consists in denying that government actions produce something, which might be either negative, neutral, or positive. | ||
It is a form of [[denialism]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_stone#Denialism] and pigheadedness[https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Argument-by-Pigheadedness]. | |||
Whereas the [[accounting fallacy]] wrongly derives a moral conclusion from an accounting statement, the [[negative anti-acounting fallacy]] denies an accounting statement on the basis of a moral premise. Worse, it denies the underlying reality. | |||
Revision as of 16:32, 13 September 2022
The anti-accounting fallacy consists in denying government actions had to cost something. The negative anti-accounting fallacy consists in denying that government actions produce something, which might be either negative, neutral, or positive.
It is a form of denialism [1] and pigheadedness[2].
Whereas the accounting fallacy wrongly derives a moral conclusion from an accounting statement, the negative anti-acounting fallacy denies an accounting statement on the basis of a moral premise. Worse, it denies the underlying reality.
