Russian invasion of Ukraine/Response: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
(→NATO) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* [https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/us-comprehensive-strategy-toward-russia U.S. Comprehensive Strategy Toward Russia] | * [https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/us-comprehensive-strategy-toward-russia U.S. Comprehensive Strategy Toward Russia] | ||
== [[Deimperialization of russia]] == | |||
* [[Anne Applebaum]], “[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/12/putin-russia-must-lose-ukraine-war-imperial-future/671891/ The Russian Empire Must Die: A better future requires Putin’s defeat—and the end to imperial aspirations.]” |
Revision as of 08:09, 31 August 2023
Ukrainian victory
- Gideon Rose, “Ukraine’s Winnable War Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory” (archive)
- Nicholas Grossman, “Russia’s Mutiny Shows Ukraine Can Win the War”, June 28, 2023 [1]
US Aid to Ukraine
- How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, Chatham House report, June 27, 2023: “The unanimous conclusion of the authors is that the only outcome to the war that can safeguard the future security of Europe is a convincing Ukrainian victory – hence, Western military support to Kyiv should be redoubled before it is too late.”
NATO
No-fly zone
- Andreas Umland, “We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all”, July 27, 2023
Foreign policy
- Alexander Vindman, “Stop Tiptoeing Around Russia It Is Time to End Washington’s Decades of Deference to Moscow” (archive)