Russian invasion of Ukraine/Response: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Andreas Umland, “[https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4119854-were-going-to-need-that-ukraine-no-fly-zone-after-all/ We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all]”, July 27, 2023 | * Andreas Umland, “[https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4119854-were-going-to-need-that-ukraine-no-fly-zone-after-all/ We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all]”, July 27, 2023 | ||
== [[Foreign policy]] == | == [[Foreign policy]] == | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 25 August 2023
Ukrainian victory
- Gideon Rose, “Ukraine’s Winnable War Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory” (archive)
- Nicholas Grossman, “Russia’s Mutiny Shows Ukraine Can Win the War”, June 28, 2023 [1]
US Aid to Ukraine
- How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, Chatham House report, June 27, 2023 🎯 “The unanimous conclusion of the authors is that the only outcome to the war that can safeguard the future security of Europe is a convincing Ukrainian victory – hence, Western military support to Kyiv should be redoubled before it is too late.”
NATO
No-fly zone
- Andreas Umland, “We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all”, July 27, 2023
