Amnesty International: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* [https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2022-06/Inquiry%20into%20Racism%20at%20Amnesty%20International%20UK%20Report%2016062022.pdf An Inquiry into institutional racism at Amnesty International UK] | * [https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2022-06/Inquiry%20into%20Racism%20at%20Amnesty%20International%20UK%20Report%2016062022.pdf An Inquiry into institutional racism at Amnesty International UK] | ||
* https://twitter.com/DarthPutinKGB/status/1651969976301920259 | |||
* [[:ru: Amnesty International]] | * [[:ru: Amnesty International]] |
Revision as of 08:45, 28 April 2023
“ Amnesty is a worthless, morally bankrupt sham that gives succour to terrorist states. The sooner it collapses under the weight of its own distortions, the better.
- Hillel Neuer, “As if on cue, Russia’s useful idiots in the West immediately use Amnesty’s distorted report” [1] (PDF) 2022-08-05
- Hillel Neuer, “The strangest thing about Amnesty International issuing a report accusing Ukraine of endangering its civilians is that this is the same organization which for the past two decades has consistently ignored or downplayed the actual deliberate use of human shields by Hamas in Gaza.” [2] (PDF) 2022-08-07
- Kamil Galeev, “Many see NGOs as a bunch of ultra-privileged Westerners focused on satisfying their ego without any regard for the cost they inflict on the people they’re supposed to “help”. This view is unfair. It’s too generalising. But the @amnesty report is playing to the worst stereotypes🧵” [3] (PDF), 2022-08-07