Russian invasion of Ukraine/Response: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
(→NATO) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/nato-summit-madrid-reinforcing-deterrence-crucial-time-the-us-national-interest NATO Summit Madrid: Reinforcing Deterrence at This Crucial Time Is in the U.S. National Interest] | * [https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/nato-summit-madrid-reinforcing-deterrence-crucial-time-the-us-national-interest NATO Summit Madrid: Reinforcing Deterrence at This Crucial Time Is in the U.S. National Interest] | ||
* [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/ukraine-needs-nato-membership-not-an-israel-model/ Ukraine needs NATO membership, not an ‘Israel model’] | |||
== No-fly zone == | == No-fly zone == | ||
Revision as of 23:16, 28 August 2023
Ukrainian victory
- Gideon Rose, “Ukraine’s Winnable War Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory” (archive)
- Nicholas Grossman, “Russia’s Mutiny Shows Ukraine Can Win the War”, June 28, 2023 [1]
US Aid to Ukraine
- How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, Chatham House report, June 27, 2023: “The unanimous conclusion of the authors is that the only outcome to the war that can safeguard the future security of Europe is a convincing Ukrainian victory – hence, Western military support to Kyiv should be redoubled before it is too late.”
NATO
No-fly zone
- Andreas Umland, “We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all”, July 27, 2023
