Russian invasion of Ukraine/Response: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== [[Russian invasion of Ukraine/US Aid to Ukraine|US Aid to Ukraine]] === | === [[Russian invasion of Ukraine/US Aid to Ukraine|US Aid to Ukraine]] === | ||
* [https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/06/how-end-russias-war-ukraine How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine], Chatham House report, June 27, 2023 [https://twitter.com/Kasparov63/status/1675497524646297601 | * [https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/06/how-end-russias-war-ukraine How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine], Chatham House report, June 27, 2023: [https://twitter.com/Kasparov63/status/1675497524646297601 “The unanimous conclusion of the authors is that the only outcome to the war that can safeguard the future security of Europe is a convincing Ukrainian victory – hence, Western military support to Kyiv should be redoubled before it is too late.”] | ||
== [[NATO]] == | == [[NATO]] == | ||
Revision as of 22:00, 25 August 2023
Ukrainian victory
- Gideon Rose, “Ukraine’s Winnable War Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory” (archive)
- Nicholas Grossman, “Russia’s Mutiny Shows Ukraine Can Win the War”, June 28, 2023 [1]
US Aid to Ukraine
- How to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, Chatham House report, June 27, 2023: “The unanimous conclusion of the authors is that the only outcome to the war that can safeguard the future security of Europe is a convincing Ukrainian victory – hence, Western military support to Kyiv should be redoubled before it is too late.”
NATO
No-fly zone
- Andreas Umland, “We’re going to need that Ukraine no-fly zone after all”, July 27, 2023
