Rothbardian contrarianism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Murray N. Rothbard]] and his followers commit this fallacy with their “a priori” ([[Murray N. Rothbard#The category error of an a priori foreign policy]]) foreign policy stance (present and future actions of government) and related historical revisionism (past actions of government): [[Rothbardian contrarianism]]. | [[Murray N. Rothbard]] and his followers commit this fallacy with their “a priori” ([[Murray N. Rothbard#The category error of an a priori foreign policy]]) foreign policy stance (present and future actions of government) and related historical revisionism (past actions of government): [[Rothbardian contrarianism]]. | ||
{{Quote|text= | {{Quote|text= | ||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 22 March 2023
Rothbardian contrarianism is a form of contrarianism and Kremlintarianism related to the negative anti-accounting fallacy. It consists in starting from the a priori position of the US government being always wrong, and then embracing historic revisionism and defending other regimes in order to fit that postulate.
Murray N. Rothbard and his followers commit this fallacy with their “a priori” (Murray N. Rothbard#The category error of an a priori foreign policy) foreign policy stance (present and future actions of government) and related historical revisionism (past actions of government): Rothbardian contrarianism.
“ The facts, by the way, provide us with two rules-of-thumb that work remarkably well in virtually all disputes through modern history: (1) the United States is always wrong (or more wrong); and (2) Great Britain is always wrong.
