No true Scotsman: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* [[Wikipedia: No true Scotsman]] | * [[Wikipedia: No true Scotsman]] | ||
* [[No Proper Statesman]] | |||
== Opposite fallacy == | |||
* [https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Hasty-Generalization hasty generalization] | |||
* [https://qr.ae/pyNmmO dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid] [https://www.quora.com/Logical-Fallacies-Whats-the-opposite-of-No-True-Scotsman] | |||
* [[Wikipedia: Accident (fallacy)]] | |||
* [[Wikipedia: Secundum quid]] | |||
* [https://qr.ae/pyNmmd It’s actually the same fallacy, because ‘no true x does y’ is the same as saying ‘all true x does not-y’.] [https://www.quora.com/Has-anyone-ever-heard-of-a-reverse-no-true-Scotsman-fallacy-Does-this-logical-fallacy-have-a-different-name] | |||
[[fr: No true Scotsman]] | [[fr: No true Scotsman]] | ||
[[Category:Logical fallacies]] | |||
