František Čuhel: Difference between revisions

From Liberpedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
::[[Mateusz Machaj]], [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Theory%20of%20Money%20and%20Fiduciary%20Media.pdf Mises and Value Theory]
::[[Mateusz Machaj]], [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Theory%20of%20Money%20and%20Fiduciary%20Media.pdf Mises and Value Theory]


== Œuvres ==
== Works ==


* [https://archive.org/details/zurlehrevondenbe00cuhe Zur Lehre von den Bedürfnissen: theoretische Untersuchungen über das Grenzgebiet der Ökonomik und der Psychologie], 1907
* [https://archive.org/details/zurlehrevondenbe00cuhe Zur Lehre von den Bedürfnissen: theoretische Untersuchungen über das Grenzgebiet der Ökonomik und der Psychologie], 1907
Line 18: Line 18:
* [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf K nauce o potřebách] [ [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf On the Theory of Needs] ], 1907
* [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf K nauce o potřebách] [ [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf On the Theory of Needs] ], 1907


* [https://cs.wikisource.org/wiki/Ott%C5%AFv_slovn%C3%ADk_nau%C4%8Dn%C3%BD/Hodnota auteur de l’entrée « valeur » dans le grand dictionnaire tchèque de 1897] : « ... théorie autrichienne, ou théorie de la valeur marginale.... que nous considérons comme la plus correcte de toutes les théories de la valeur existantes... »
* [https://cs.wikisource.org/wiki/Ott%C5%AFv_slovn%C3%ADk_nau%C4%8Dn%C3%BD/Hodnota author of the "value" entry in the big Czech dictionary of 1897]: "... Austrian theory, or theory of marginal value... which we consider as the most correct of all existing value theories..."


== Articles à propos ==
== Articles about ==


* [[Jeffrey Tucker]], « [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/marginal-marginalist-from-prague-jeffrey-tucker/ The Marginal Marginalist from Prague] »
* [[Jeffrey Tucker]], "[https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/marginal-marginalist-from-prague-jeffrey-tucker/ The Marginal Marginalist from Prague]"
* [[Josef Šíma]], « Les Tchèques et les idées autrichiennes », in ''Histoire du libéralisme en Europe'', éd. Philippe Nemo et Jean Petitot, PUF, Paris, 2006, p. 1270 .
* [[Josef Šíma]], "Les Tchèques et les idées autrichiennes", in ''Histoire du libéralisme en Europe'', ed. Philippe Nemo et Jean Petitot, PUF, Paris, 2006, p. 1270 .
* [[Jörg Guido Hülsmann]], ''[https://mises.org/library/mises-last-knight-liberalism-0 Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism]'', 2007, pp. 218-219.
* [[Jörg Guido Hülsmann]], ''[https://mises.org/library/mises-last-knight-liberalism-0 Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism]'', 2007, pp. 218-219.
* Marek Hudík, « [http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf František Čuhel (1862-1914)] » ''New Perspectives on Political Economy'', Volume 3, Number 1, 2007, pp. 3-14.
* Marek Hudík, "[http://liberpedia.net/t/nppe3_1.pdf František Čuhel (1862-1914)]" ''New Perspectives on Political Economy'', Volume 3, Number 1, 2007, pp. 3-14.
* Wikibéral, [http://www.wikiberal.org/wiki/Franz_Cuhel Franz Cuhel]
* Wikibéral, [http://www.wikiberal.org/wiki/Franz_Cuhel Franz Cuhel]
* Wikipedia CS, [https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franti%C5%A1ek_%C4%8Cuhel František Čuhel]
* Wikipedia CS, [https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franti%C5%A1ek_%C4%8Cuhel František Čuhel]

Revision as of 22:16, 9 October 2019

František Čuhel, also known as Franz Cuhel (Germanized version, as he lived in Czech lands during the Austro-Hungarian empire) is a Czech economist from the Austrian School of Economics (1862-1914).

The science of the last forty years may not simply be ignored. Today one may no longer be satisfied with a cursory consideration of Menger and Böhm-Bawerk; one must also be familiar with Pareto and have read Cuhel and Strigl, not to mention the most recent works in this field.
Ludwig von Mises [1]

He contributed to the Austrian value theory and the theory of ordinal preferences. He was the first to criticize the theory of cardinal utility and of interpersonal utility comparisons.

Rothbard even wrote about the "Cuhel-Mises theory of ordinal marginal utility" . Murray N. Rothbard, "Foreword to The Theory of Money and Credit by Mises", 1981.

Yet the more radical was the second stage, which grew as a natural conclusion of the previous one. If values are subjective, then it follows that objective measurement is impossible. They cannot be subjected to a truly “scientific” analysis (as in natural sciences). This radical conclusion was put forth by the important Czech economist Franz Čuhel (1907). His insights could be portrayed as deconstructivist for most value theories, for they attacked any price theory which was grounded in utility or value measurements. Čuhel’s sweeping investigation was immediately accepted by Mises as fundamentally sound, despite the fact that value measurements were used by the Austrian School representatives (Mises 1981, p. 54). Although Menger did not use them, his framework did not preclude such possibility. Böhm-Bawerk used utility measurements frequently in his writings. He was even criticized by Čuhel himself and admitted that he only believed in soft measurability of sensations.
Mateusz Machaj, Mises and Value Theory

Works

Articles about