Category:Religion: Difference between revisions
From Liberpedia
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Libertarianism and religion | Libertarianism and religion | ||
= Papal encyclicals relevant for political and moral questions = | |||
* [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html Populorum Progressio], Paul VI, 1967 | |||
* [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_en.html Humanae Vitae], Paul VI, 1968 | |||
* [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis_en.html Sollicitudo Rei Socialis], John Paul II, 1987 | |||
* [http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html Evangelii Gaudium], Francis I, 2013 | |||
= Libertarians defending religion and religious movements = | = Libertarians defending religion and religious movements = | ||
| Line 6: | Line 13: | ||
* [[François Guillaumat]], [http://fr.liberpedia.org/La_Politique_du_D%C3%A9calogue La Politique du Décalogue] | * [[François Guillaumat]], [http://fr.liberpedia.org/La_Politique_du_D%C3%A9calogue La Politique du Décalogue] | ||
* James Redford, [http://www.anti-state.com/redford/redford4.html Jesus Is an Anarchist] | |||
= Libertarians critical of religion and religious movements = | = Libertarians critical of religion and religious movements = | ||
Latest revision as of 05:42, 28 December 2014
Libertarianism and religion
Papal encyclicals relevant for political and moral questions
- Populorum Progressio, Paul VI, 1967
- Humanae Vitae, Paul VI, 1968
- Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, John Paul II, 1987
- Evangelii Gaudium, Francis I, 2013
Libertarians defending religion and religious movements
- James Redford, Jesus Is an Anarchist
Libertarians critical of religion and religious movements
Ayn Rand
Ludwig von Mises
- Wherever it is not in power, Marxism claims all the basic liberal rights, for they alone can give it the freedom which its propaganda urgently needs. But it can never understand their spirit and will never grant them to its opponents when it comes into power itself. In this respect it resembles the Churches and other institutions which rest on the principle of violence. These, too, exploit the democratic liberties when they are fighting their battle, but once in power they deny their adversaries such rights.
